Legal Opinion
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1930No. 27,626PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The city of St. Paul condemned property of the McGill-Warner Company for the improvement of Third street. The company appealed to the district court from the ratification and confirmation by the city council of the findings' of the commissioner of finance, who first made the award of damages. By § 271 of the charter the property owner appealing to the district court is required to furnish the city a bond “conditioned to pay all costs which may be awarded against appellant.”
The city prevailed on the appeal to the district court. It then applied to the clerk of the district court to tax its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Kroshus v. County of HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. Miller Home Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State, Benson v. LesslieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- County of McLennan v. ShinaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975