Legal Opinion

City of Anchorage v. Scavenius

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1975No. 2214, 2222PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This appeal presents issues as to the award of costs and attorney’s fees to the condemning authority in eminent domain cases.1 In the Scavenius case, the City brought an action to condemn easements for the construction, use and maintenance of a sanitary sewer line. A master’s hearing resulted in an award of $516.00 from which the property owner appealed pursuant to Alaska R.Civ.P. 72(h)(5). Subse*1171quently, the City served on the property owner an offer of judgment for $581.47 in accordance with Alaska R.Civ.P. 68.2 The offer of judgment was not accepted, and, eventually, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hollywood Baptist Church of Rome v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ryan v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  5. Chavez v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re the Estate of HutchinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Progressive Insurance Co. v. SimmonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wickwire v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API