Legal Opinion

Kroshus v. County of Houston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Houston county, where the actions were tried by Farmer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The appellant presented- two claims, amounting in the aggregate to $226.52, to the county commissioners, and they were allowed in full. The county attorney took appeals to the district court, where, by stipulation, the appeals were consolidated and tried as one, and the court disallowed items of the claims amounting, to $67.60, and directed that this appellant recover of the county $158.92, and that the county recover of him its costs and disbursements, to be taxed. The costs having been taxed, judgment was entered as directed,, and the claimant appeals.

*163The only question raised here is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brackett v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. State v. Miller Home Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. In Re Petition of SchallerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API