Legal Opinion
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 12, 1929No. 27,136PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, O.
Appeal by J ames D. Ryan from a judgment confirming an award of damages made by the council of the city of St. Paul in a proceeding to condemn land for a street improvement.
Ryan is the owner of lot 15 and part of lot 6 in auditor’s subdivision No. 18, city of St. Paul. The city undertook to condemn his' property and other land for what is known in general terms as the Third street improvement. The proceeding was conducted under the home rule charter of the city. An award was made by the city council of the damages to be paid to Ryan for the property. He appealed to the district court…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dugan v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- City of Paris v. O.N. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1907
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. CantrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Turenne v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.