Legal Opinion

Steilberg v. Lackner

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1977No. Civ. 38890PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

The Issue

In this appeal we are called upon to interpret the meaning of, and the interrelationship between, sections 11152 and 11153.7 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The precise issue is whether an applicant who owns and uses a multiple dwelling as her home, a part of which she rents, is entitled to Medi-Cal benefits regardless of the value of the property (§ 11152) or whether in determining eligibility for such benefits the $5,000 assessed value limitation contained in section 11153.7 applies.

Facts

In June 1974, respondent Elizabeth Steilberg, born in 1896, applied for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Sand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Robinson v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API