Legal Opinion
Textrol, Inc. v. D. C. Oviatt Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 22, 1964No. Civ. A. No. C 63-234PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.
Plaintiff has alleged that defendant infringed plaintiff’s patent No. 3,004,647, and this has been denied by defendant. On August 18, 1964, plaintiff propounded interrogatories Nos. 22 through 28, to which defendant has objected.
The interrogatories are as follows:
“22. What function or functions are performed by relay coil CR 3 in line 12 of Defendant’s control shown in Exhibit G ?
“23. What function or functions are performed by relay coil CR 4 in line 13 of Defendant’s control shown in Exhibit G?
“24. What function or functions are performed by relay contacts CR 3…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Hoak v. Empire Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1946
- Dusek v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
- Empire Scientific Corp. v. Pickering & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Microtron Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.