Legal Opinion
Microtron Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 1, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 1058-66PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOLAHAN, District Judge:
The present matter has come before the Court on cross objections to interrogatories served pursuant to a schedule of discovery established by the Court. Plaintiff [Microtron Corporation] objects to 34 interrogatories served upon it by defendants. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing [Minnesota]- and Union Carbide Corporation [Carbide] object to 3 and 2 interrogatories respectively of those served upon them by plaintiff.
This is a suit for injunctive relief and treble damages for violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. Microtron is a wholly owned subsidiary of Kem*24Wove…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Textrol, Inc. v. D. C. Oviatt Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Brother International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Empire Scientific Corp. v. Pickering & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- H.D., et al v. West Orange Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026