Empire Scientific Corp. v. Pickering & Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*6Memorandum of Decision and Order
MISHLER, District Judge.
Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order striking plaintiff’s second set of interrogatories, Nos. 57 to 72 inclusive.
Both parties are New York corpora-ions having their principal places of business within the Eastern District of New York. Jurisdiction is based upon the patent laws of the United States.1
The patents in issue, No. 2,917,590 and No. 3,146,319, are owned by defendant and relate to certain stereo cartridges. Plaintiff contends not only that its cartridges, the Empire 888P and its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. NYSCO Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Diversified Products Corp. v. Sports Center Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
- Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Sunbeam CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Gretener, A.G. v. Dyson-Kissner Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969