Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

MEMORANDUM

CROAKE, District Judge.

The defendant insurance company has objected to certain interrogatories pro pounded by the plaintiff in this action to recover on a Brokers’ Blanket Bond issued by the defendant. The bond was to recover “[a]ny loss through any dishonest, fraudulent or criminal act of any of the Employees * * * ” of the plaintiff. 1 The plaintiff claims that it has suffered such a loss.

I

Defendant has objected to Interrogatories 14 and 19 which, respectively, ask the defendant corporation to define “dishonest act” and “fraudulent act,” and to state if certain specific acts are…