Comstock v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Bland, Judge,
delivered-the opinion of the court:
The importation bears the trade name of “Kronos titanium.” It is titanium oxide in physical combination with barium sulphate, and is used as a pigment in compounding paints. It-was classified by the collector under paragraph 91 of the tariff act of 1922. The Board of General Appraisers, in a very clear and well written opinion by Judge McClelland, affirmed the decision of the collector.
Paragraph 91 is as follows:
Titanium potassium oxalate, and all compounds and mixtures containing titanium, 30 per centum ad valorem. (Italics ours.)
*504The importers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. SiegleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3Cited by16 opinions
- Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- United States v. PealtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Murphy & Stevenson (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.