Legal Opinion

Wentworth v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The Portland Contracting Company was engaged in constructing a highway in Holderness. Gravel for use in the work was hauled by trucks from a gravel pit located on the land of one Elliott in Plymouth. The road leading to the pit crossed the tracks of the defendant railroad at grade. The crossing was a private one, maintained for the accommodation of the Elliott farm. Permission to use the crossing was granted the contracting company by the railroad on condition that the company station a flagman there.

Austin S. Graton, Jr., the plaintiff’s intestate, was the driver of one of the trucks. He was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tullgren v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Hobbs v. George W. Blanchard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  4. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. Hoyt v. TiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  3. Deitch v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API