Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Tilton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

At the outset of the case a question is presented as to the effect of the verdict which has been found for the defendant. It is urged on his behalf that the rule as to a general verdict and judgment should apply, and that therefore the verdict is conclusive against the plaintiff as to all facts which were in any way involved in the case as submitted to the jury.

The verdict establishes that no combination of facts existed which would warrant a recovery under the charge. That is, it is to be taken as true that the defendant did not furnish liquor whereby one not his servant became intoxicated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Couchman v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kraus v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Davies v. ButlerNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Turner v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API