Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Two issues are raised by this appeal from the trial court's grant of defendant/respondent's motion for summary judgment. First, is a 1915 contract for water rights entered into by appellants' and respondent's predecessors in interest binding on them today? Second, does RCW 87.03.045 and RCW 87.03.050, relating to a voting scheme for the irrigation district, violate Const. art. 1, § 19 by infringing on the right of suffrage? We conclude that the 1915 contract is binding on these parties and that RCW 87.03.045 and .050 unconstitutionally infringe upon appellants' right to vote under Const, art.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ball v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Brower v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Seattle v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Department of Ecology v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.