Legal Opinion
BLH, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 22, 1983No. 433-81CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARKINS, Judge.
The issue presented by cross-motions for summary judgment in this case is whether plaintiff’s dissolution under Delaware corporation law on June 21, 1976, and the expiration of the statutory 3-year winding up period, eliminated plaintiff’s capacity under USCCR 17(b) to sue or be sued on claims defined in a final decision of a contracting officer made July 15, 1980, pursuant to the disputes clause of a contract that was executed on April 15, 1968. For reasons that follow, plaintiff lacked the capacity to sue or be sued when the petition was filed in the United States…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- In Re Citadel Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
- Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Services Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- In Re Tutu Wells Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1993
- BLH, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Computer Products International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.