Legal Opinion
In Re Citadel Industries, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided November 21, 1980PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Vice Chancellor.
As a result of an ex parte application made pursuant to 8 Del.C. § 278, an order was entered by this Court on December 21, 1979 purporting to continue and extend the corporate existence of Citadel Industries, Inc. so as to permit the corporation to be joined as a party defendant in complex tort litigation already pending in Texas. Thereafter, a motion was promptly filed on behalf of Citadel Industries, Inc. to vacate that order. This is a decision on that motion. The decision involves an interpretation of the meaning of 8 Del.C. § 278 in light of certain amendments made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Services Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Addy v. ShortSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Harned v. Beacon Hill Real Estate Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
- Lockwood v. OFB CORPORATIONCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Marsh v. RosenbloomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Metro Communication Corp. v. Advanced Mobilecomm Technologies Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Miramar Marine, Inc. v. Citi Walk Development Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2017
- Pacific Scene, Inc. v. Penasquitos, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.