Legal Opinion

BLH, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 15, 1987No. Nos. 333-84C, 352-85CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The dispute centers upon whether the liability of a defunct corporation can be satisfied against either of its parent companies. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied.

Facts

On June 26, 1984 (No. 333-84C), and again on June 11, 1985 (No. 352-85C), plaintiffs filed their respective complaints requesting that the court rule that they have no liability under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Femme Comp Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Barrett Refining Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. T & S Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Orange Cove Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API