Legal Opinion

In re Government of Norway

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 8, 1959No. Cong. No. 6-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

This matter comes before the court pursuant to the Convention of March 28, 1940 (62 Stat. 1798), concluded between the Governments of Norway and the United States.1 In general, it provides for the disposition of claims of Norway on account of damages alleged to have been sustained during and immediately after World War I by the late Christoff er Hannevig with respect to certain of his properties and interests.

The Convention provides for the exchange of pleadings and supporting evidence by the two Governments. Within the agreement is the further declaration that evidence not submitted pursuant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Harned v. Beacon Hill Real Estate Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
  5. Weston Paper Mfg. Co. v. Downing Box Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  2. Bistline v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API