Kosanke v. United States Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Chief Judge:. Appellants are two individuals who allegedly staked mining claims on federal lands and two other individuals to whom they assigned an interest in these claims. The Department of the Interior’s (“DOI”) Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) declared Appellants’ mining claims void ab initio, on the grounds that the land in question had been closed to mining entries pursuant to two separate DOI actions segregating the land from the operation of mining law, both of which had been duly noted on the appropriate public land records. The Interior Board of Land Appeals affirmed this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dr Pepper/seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Pathfinder Mines Corp. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Shiny Rock Mining Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Independent Petroleum Ass'n of America v. DewittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Marinangeli v. LehmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Freeman v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Donald Eno v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Indep Petro Assn v. DeWitt, Wallace P.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002