Legal Opinion
Shiny Rock Mining Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1987No. 86-3643PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Shiny Rock Mining Corporation (“Shiny Rock”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the government, 629 F.Supp. 877. The district court adopted the magistrate’s findings which upheld the initial Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) decision and the af-firmance and reaffirmance by the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) that Shiny Rock’s mining claim was null and void ab initio due to the “notation rule,” thereby rejecting Shiny Rock’s mineral patent application. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
Public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Holt v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Henrikson v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Wind River Mining Corporation v. United States of America Manuel Lujan, Jr. Delos Jacobson, Director of the Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Tommy v. Greenhow v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Mt Royal Joint Vntr v. Kempthorne, DirkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Shiny Rock Mining Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.