Legal Opinion

Donald Eno v. Sally Jewell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2015No. 13-15166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

The Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) “departs from the general rule that each party to a lawsuit pays his or her own legal fees.” Scarborough v. Principi, 541 U.S. 401, 404, 124 S.Ct. 1856, 158 L.Ed.2d 674 (2004). The EAJA entitles those who prevail on a legal claim against the U.S. government to an award of fees and costs, but only if they prevail in adversary adjudications. Specifically excluded from this category are proceedings “for the purpose of granting or renewing a license.” 5 U.S.C. § 504(b)(l)(C)(i).

Our question is whether a hearing under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. Ray Shumway Molly ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donald Eno v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Eno v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Jon Saltzman v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API