Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages for personal injuries sustained while he was about to board the “Norfolk Mam”, a freighter docked at a municipal pier in Los Angeles harbor. The jury awarded damages to the plaintiff. The defendant moved in the alternative for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a motion for a directed verdict having been made before the cause was sub- . mitted to the jury. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the. verdict was denied and the defendant has appealed from the order denying the motion.
If the trial court should have granted the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Pomponio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Klein v. United StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- O'Shea v. Claude C. Wood Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.