Legal Opinion

Wentink v. TrapHagen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1940No. 30756PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action wherein plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries. The plaintiff was an employee of the Hardy Furniture Company. The employer is made a defendant because it is paying workmen’s compensation to the plaintiff and is subrogated to, and interested in, plaintiff’s cause of action. The defendants Traphagen and Farnham own the premises where the accident occurred. The defendants Mason are tenants of a part of the premises.

The plaintiff alleged the facts recited herein. The defendants landlord and tenant, answering separately, denied generally, and alleged that, if plaintiff…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Anderson v. ByrdNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bedell v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brugher v. . BuchtenkirchNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Hudson v. Church of the Holy TrinityNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Huyink v. Hart Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Malolepszy v. Central Market, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hammond v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Chew v. CoffinNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Johnson v. GoodierNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API