Legal Opinion

Koshland v. Hartford Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Umatilla: Robert Eakin, Judge. Action by Marcus S. Koshland against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. "Justice Bean.

This is an action against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company to recover $1,600 on a policy issued by it to one Charles Cunningham, and by him assigned to the plaintiff after loss. In many of its features the •case is similar to the actions brought by the plaintiff .against the Home Mutual Insurance Company, 31 Or. 321 (49 Pac. 864), and the Fire Association of Philadelphia, 31 Or. 362 (49 Pac. 865), to recover under policies issued by them, and covering property •destroyed by the same fire which caused the loss under the policy now in suit; and therefore the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Dolliver v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Walradt v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Koshland v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Judge v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Williams v. Pacific States Fire Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Arthur v. Palatine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Peters v. Queen City Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Sproul v. Western Assurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API