Arthur v. Palatine Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by J. M. Arthur & Co. against the Palatine Insurance Company, limited, to recover the amount of loss under an insurance policy. The plaintiff had judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This is an action upon a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant to McGee Bros., insuring them to the amount of $3,500 on certain buildings, engines, boilers, and other mill machinery at Ballard, in the State of Washington, “loss, if any, payable to J. M. Arthur & Company, Portland, Oregon, as their interest may appear.” The insurance was for one year from the third of February, 1895, and the property was destroyed by fire on the twenty-fifth of the same month. At the time the insurance was effected McGee Bros, did not own the1 property covered by the policy, but were in possession…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. BohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Short v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Continental Insurance v. MunnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Kabban v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.