Legal Opinion

McCubbins v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1986No. 8510IC210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the record shows plaintiffs claim was not timely filed and that it was error for the Commission to vacate the Deputy Commissioner’s dismissal of the claim. This contention is without merit. G.S. 97-58(c) provides that “[t]he right to compensation for occupational disease shall be barred unless a claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after death, disability, or disablement as the case may be.” Though the two year time limit for timely filing is a jurisdictional requisite, without which the Industrial Commission may not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Terrell v. Terminix Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Lentz v. Phil's Toy StoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API