Legal Opinion

People v. Buckingham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 2, 1997No. 97SA146PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties agreed in the conditional admission to discipline in the range of a public censure to a thirty-day suspension from the practice of law. In approving the conditional admission, an inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee recommended that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in this state in 1979. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FarrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. FritzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. SilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. People v. VseteckaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API