Legal Opinion

People v. Farry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1996No. 96SA388Published

1Per curiam

This reciprocal discipline matter under C.R.C.P. 241.17 comes to us on a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. C.R.C.P. 241.18. In the conditional admission, the respondent consents to the imposition of a thirty-day suspension from the practice of law. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission. We accept the conditional admission and order that the respondent be suspended for thirty days.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1991.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. FarrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API