Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Culter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 18, 2011No. 10PDJ099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(b)

I. SUMMARY

Respondent, an estate planning attorney, solicited and accepted loans from clients without recommending they seek independent legal advice or obtaining their written consent to the transactions. Respondent stipulated that this conduct violated Colo. RPC 1.8(a). The People also allege Respondent misrepresented facts regarding the loan transactions to his clients in violation of Colo. RPC 8 4(c). We agree that Respondent misrepresented his intended use of a loan to one client, but we disagree with the People's…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Johnson v. Riebesell (In Re Riebesell)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re RosenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson v. Central Bank Denver, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney Grievance v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API