State Finance Co. v. Hershel California Fruit Products Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
This action was commenced by plaintiff State Finance Company against defendant Hershel Cali fornia Fruit Products Company for the recovery of $1659.86. In January, 1930, one Joe Tedesco entered into a written contract, for a period of three years, with defendant to haul tomatoes- from the fields of the growers to the company’s plant. In December, 1931, Tedesco executed an assignment in writing to the plaintiff of moneys which would become due to him from defendant for the 1932 hauling season. Two complaints in intervention were filed; one by Boceo Albanese for $1336.44, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Harbor Construction Co. v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Nuttman v. ChaisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bare v. Richman & Samuels, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Waldteufel v. SailorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.