Legal Opinion

Bare v. Richman & Samuels, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1943No. Civ. 6780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This case is determined on a rehearing. It appears that the defendant, Richman & Samuels, Inc., a produce marketing corporation of New York, has appealed from a judgment for $2,224.10 and interest, which was rendered against it in a suit in assumpsit for the unpaid portion of the proceeds from sales of fifteen carloads of grapes, pursuant to the terms of an agreement consigning the grapes to the corporation for sale. The plaintiff orally directed the corporation to sell the grapes for market value f.o.b. Turlock, which was shown to be $27.50 per ton. A portion of the grapes was sold at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Curtiss v. Starr & Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Glantz v. FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Farnham v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Katz v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Marine Terminals Corp. v. Paceco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Worthington Corp. v. El Chicote Ranch Properties, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API