People v. Marsh
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Ingham; Wiest, J. Arthur E. Marsh was convicted of being an accessory, to the crime of fraud and embezzlement in office: On respondent’s motion to dismiss appeal and remand cause.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
April 5,1900, the respondent was convicted in the circuit court for the county of Ingham of the crime of being an accessory and of aiding and abetting William L. White, quartermaster general of this State, in the crime of fraud, and embezzlement in said office. Before sentence, but after conviction in the circuit court, the respondent brought his case into this court by a bill of exceptions. While the case was still pending in this court, the governor issued a pardon to the respondent, the material part of which, so far as this discussion is concerned, reads as follows:
“Now, therefore, -know…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Ex Parte WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Manlove v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Madigan v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- In re PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- State ex rel. Davis v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.