Legal Opinion

Manlove v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1899No. 18,583PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Appellant was convicted of seduction and sentenced to the reformatory. The Attorney-General, by verified motion to dismiss, shows that appellant since taking this appeal has married the complaining witness and accepted the Governor’s pardon conditioned on good behavior. Appellant admits these facts, but contends that he is entitled to a review of the proceedings because that part of the judgment which assesses a fine and costs against him remains in force.

A party may not accept a benefit based on the legality of a judgment and thereafter be heard to complain that the judgment is erroneous. 2…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. Salimonie Mining & Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Faucher v. GrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. Stephens v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Garner v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. McGrew v. GraystonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dunn v. State ex rel. EakinIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. People v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State ex rel. Gregory v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Monger v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API