Baker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was indicted, charged with burglary. The offense is alleged to have occurred on the 9th of last February, but he was not tried until the 14th day of March. What is known as the “suspended sentence” law had been passed when appellant was tried, and it carrying the emergency clause, had gone into effect. Appellant, before the trial began, filed a written request, in substance, as follows:
“How comes the defendant in the above styled and numbered cause, and being then and there charged by indictment with the offense of burglary other than a private residence at night, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Camron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Campion v. GillanNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Gilmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ex Parte HaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Ivey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.