Legal Opinion

Kistler v. Vasi

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969No. L. A. 29626PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment'for defendants in an action to recover the balance due on ■ a promissory note. The note was secured by a second deed of trust on real property, but the security had been exhausted by a sale under the first deed of trust. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the undisputed facts established that Code of Civil Procedure section 580b barred any recovery. We agree with plaintiffs’ contention that section 580b does not bar recovery in this case.

Plaintiffs are real estate brokers who acted for both parties in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bargioni v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Prunty v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Coker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API