Legal Opinion

Hailey v. . Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is a resident and taxpayer of the city of Winston-Salem, which is a municipal corporation. The city, the members of the board of aldermen, the mayor, and the secretary-treasurer of the city are the defendants. The material facts are set forth in the agreed case as follows:

3. The defendants are about to issue bonds, of the aggregate face amount of $2,500,000, of the city of Winston-Salem, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Finance Act, 1921, of North Carolina, constituting chapter 106 of the Public Laws of 1921, Extraordinary Session of North Carolina, as amended, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Brown v. Road CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Coble v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Hollowell v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. City of Gastonia v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Town of Boone v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Floyd v. Lumberton City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. City of Asheville v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API