Floyd v. Lumberton City Board of Education
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The two arguments raised by plaintiffs on this appeal are that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to declare Chapter 1248 was unconstitutional or otherwise illegal, and that it erred in declaring that the implementation of the act was not unconstitutional or illegal.
I
The crux of plaintiffs’ argument is that the legislation is unconstitutional in that it violates Article II, section 24(l)(h) of the North Carolina Constitution. That section provides, in pertinent part, that: “The General Assembly shall not enact any local, private, or special act or resolution .…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- High Point Surplus Company v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Sneed v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Gardner v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Idol v. StreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- North Carolina Motorcoach Ass'n Ex Rel. McGill, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools System v. ChaviouxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- City of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993