Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Asheville v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 2016No. 391PA15Published

1DissentJustice Newby

Throughout our history, when communities needed a governmental provision of water and sewer services, the General Assembly, by local act, would grant a local government unit the authority to act. Here the majority’s holding ignores this historic constitutional understanding of the plenary authority of the General Assembly to oversee local government subdivisions and create new ones when necessary. Our history and our constitution recognize this plenary authority is necessary because the General Assembly is uniquely situated to oversee local government *107and address changing needs. Now the Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. White v. Commissioners of ChowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API