Legal Opinion

People v. OSKINS

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1999No. B117298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

Penal Code section 12020 makes it illegal to possess any of a long list of weapons. (All unlabeled statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Among them is a “dirk or dagger.” Subdivision (c)(24) of the statute defines those terms as “a knife or other instrument with or without a handguard that is capable of ready use as a stabbing weapon that may inflict great bodily injury or death.” The principal issue in this case is what, if any, mens rea is required for violation of this portion of the statute.

William S. Oskins appeals from his judgment of conviction by jury trial of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. AubreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. GaitanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. Pineda CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API