People v. Gaitan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
After defendant waived his right to a jury trial, the trial court found him guilty of possessing a deadly weapon, to wit, metal knuckles (Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)(1)).1 As a result, defendant was sentenced to the midterm of two years in state prison. On appeal, defendant contends his conviction should be reversed because the trial court erroneously applied a strict liability standard and improperly ignored his lack of criminal intent in finding him guilty of possessing a deadly weapon. In the alternative, defendant contends his conviction should be reversed because there…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Martin Alonzo L.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Baugh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In Re DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. BaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- The People v. Naranjo CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013