Legal Opinion

People v. Aubrey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1999No. A081058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

J.Appellant Henry Calvin Aubrey III was charged with one felony count of carrying a concealed “dirk or dagger.” (Pen. Code, § 12020, subds. (a), (c)(24)). The information also alleged that, under California’s “Three Strikes” law (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)), appellant had one “strike” prior felony conviction. In a bifurcated trial, the jury found appellant guilty as charged and found true the allegations about the prior “strike.” Appellant filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that defense counsel was ineffective for conceding that the objects in appellant’s possession…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. Pineda CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API