Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Levine

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 10, 1943No. Docket 149/367PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a motion under rule 70 of the Court of Chancery to strike out the bill of complaint, or parts thereof on the grounds set forth in the answer. The bill of complaint alleges in substance that complainant is a dentist, specializing in orthodontia, with offices in Newark and Passaic; that the defendant also a dentist desired to learn the art of orthodontia under the complainant's tutelage; that the parties by agreement in writing dated July 1st, 1940, entered into a professional agreement by which the defendant became an assistant to complainant for five years, at fixed compensation, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Somerville Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  2. Moresh v. O'ReganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. John R. Thompson v. DelicatessenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. Union Trust Co. v. Goerke Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Union County Trust Co. v. Goerke Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGovern v. Van RiperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Kwass v. KerseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Township of Ewing v. TrentonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  4. Trisolini v. MeltsnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Devine v. DevineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API