Legal Opinion

Trisolini v. Meltsner

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 3, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

23 N.J. Super. 204 (1952)

92 A.2d 832

MARTHA TRISOLINI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LIEBGARD M. MELTSNER, GUIDO OR GUY TRISOLINI, AND GUY TRISOLINI, JR., A MINOR, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 10, 1952.

Decided December 3, 1952.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, PROCTOR and FRANCIS.

Mr. Anthony P. La Porta argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Robert W. Emery argued the cause for defendant-respondent Liebgard M. Meltsner.

Mr. Abraham M. Nickelsporn argued the cause for defendant-respondent Guido or Guy Trisolini.

The opinion of the court was delivered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
  2. Hedden v. HandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Hodgeman v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Weiss v. LevineNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re a Resolution of the State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. TOWNECRAFT, ETC, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Malhame v. Borough of DemarestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Kugler v. RomainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API