Legal Opinion
Devine v. Devine
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 3, 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. Super. 522 (1952)
90 A.2d 126
KATHRYN DEVINE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HELEN DEVINE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided July 3, 1952.
Mr. Frederick F. Richardson, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. McKeown, Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos (Mr. Maurice J. McKeown appearing), attorneys for defendant.
EWART, J.S.C.
The plaintiff, daughter-in-law of the defendant, by her complaint seeks the aid of this court and demands a judgment "enjoining and restraining the defendant, Helen Devine, from the doing of any acts designed or having the effect of maliciously and improperly interfering…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
- Grobart v. GrobartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Mayer v. Journeymen Stonecutters' Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
- John R. Thompson v. DelicatessenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Loigman v. TP. COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWNSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. TOWNECRAFT, ETC, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Hafner v. HafnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Gaines v. DobyWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.