Legal Opinion

Township of Ewing v. Trenton

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 5, 1945No. Docket 148/536PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant proposes that this court should not entertain the alleged cause of action of the complainants. The defendant's motion for an order striking out the bill of complaint as amended presents that question for decision. Two major grounds are specified in support of the motion: (1) that adequate and complete remedies, if factually and legally sustained, are available to the complainants in an action at law heretofore authorized and directed to be instituted immediately on behalf of the defendant; (2) that there are no equitable considerations reasonably requiring the aid of this court.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. La Rosa ex rel. La Rosa v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  2. Burdick v. GrimshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. McCrory Stores Corp. v. S. M. Braunstein, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  4. Capraro v. PropatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  5. Briscoe v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. REGO INDUSTRIES v. American Mod. Metals Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Utility Blade & Razor Co. v. DonovanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. ButlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Wetzstein v. DehrkoopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API