Meyer v. Somerville Water Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, Y. C.
The defendant Somerville Water Company is supplying water to Baritan and Somerville, and to residents along certain roads leading from these towns. The water is obtained from the Baritan river, at Baritan, of which the complainants are lower riparian owners. The average flow of the river during nine months of the year is about two hundred and fifty million gallons per day, and the low-water flow is sixty-one million gallons. At a point about three miles above the defendant’s works the river is dammed and the water diverted into the canal of the Baritan Water Power Company, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Whalen v. DalashmuttCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Mayor & Aldermen of Paterson v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Mayor & Aldermen of Paterson v. West Orange Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Silbros, Inc. v. SolomonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Weiss v. LevineNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Sheahan v. UPPER GREENWOOD LAKE, ETC., ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.