Legal Opinion
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 15, 1997No. C2-95-2627PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This declaratory judgment action was brought by Ruth and Booker Washington (Washingtons) to compel Milbank Insurance Company (Milbank) to arbitrate the Wash-ingtons’ underinsured motorist (UIM) claim. The Washingtons’ UIM claim arose from Mrs. Washington’s involvement in a motor vehicle accident on November 11, 1989, with Junauld Presley (Presley) who was insured by State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) with a liability coverage limit of $50,-000. Mrs. Washington was insured by Mil-bank under an automobile insurance policy which afforded her UIM coverage of $100,-000.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- True v. RainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RiggsKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Rantapaa v. Black Hills Chair Lift Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.