Instrumentation Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
The proper tariff classification of certain respiratory testing instruments imported from Holland is the question the court is here called upon to determine.
Instruments with six different designations are involved and are covered by six protests, the consolidation of which protests has been granted by the court, and their enumeration is contained in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision.
At the time of importation, the merchandise was classified by the customs officials as laboratory apparatus in paragraph 360 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Empire Findings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- United States v. PealtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Trumpf Medical Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Arbor Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Carmichael International Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Propper Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.