Legal Opinion

Empire Findings Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 1, 1960No. C.D. 2148PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Certain imported otoscopes were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as surgical instruments and assessed with duty at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 359 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec. 403, T.D. 52373, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, 85 Treas. Dec. 116, T.D. 52462.

Various claims have been interposed by plaintiff challenging the collector’s action, and, while none of them has been waived, plaintiff relies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ducommun Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. Kny-Scheerer Corp. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Empire Findings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API