Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 22, 1964No. C.D. 2428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawkeNCe, Judge:

Creative skill has given us a unique device known as a “Vitascope.” It is not the Vitascope of earlier days which was used in the motion-picture industry. This new invention is a contrivance which, at the time of this trial, has been in use in this country for about 4 years.

The instrument is used for the purpose of determining the germinating properties of seeds, such as oats, rye, barley, et cetera,' based upon what is known as the tetrazolium process. This will be described more in detail, infra.

The importation is referred to on the “Special Customs INvoice” as—

1 Vitascope…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burrows Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Instrumentation Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Packard Instrument Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Burrows Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Burrows Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API