United States v. Pealtz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
Paragraphs 302 and 374 of the Tariff Act of 1922 are as follows:
Par. 302. Manganese ore or concentrates containing in excess of 30 per centum of metallic manganese, 1 cent per pound on the metallic manganese contained therein; molybdenum ore or concentrates, 35 cents per pound on the metallic molybdenum contained therein; tungsten ore or concentrates, 45 cents per pound on the metallic tungsten contained therein; ferromanganese containing more than 1 per centum of carbon, 1% cents per pound on the metallic manganese *359contained therein: Provided, That ferromanganese for the purposes of this Act…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Seeberger v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Comstock v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. S. H. Kress & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Marshall Field & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- United States v. Electrolux Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Instrumentation Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.